God Dialectic

This is going to need some thorough research but let’s begin with the below:

The very fact that atheists exist is evidence enough for there being no god.

Think about it. If god were real, his presence would be evident without the need for proof.

There would be no doubting his existence.

However, atheists doubt the existence of all gods. Every god. Including YHWH.

The fact that doubt occurs, according to Descartes, is enough for the premise of a god to be debunked.

Thesis = there is a god

Antithesis = there is no god

Synthesis = there is an assertion of god that might be untrue

New thesis = there might be a god

Antithesis = there definitely is a god

Synthesis = there is no absolute term here without proof.

New thesis = there is no proof of god

Antithesis = there is proof all around us for god

Synthesis = the evidence around us can be explained by other means

New thesis = There is more support for there being no gods than there being any gods

Antithesis = I have faith that god exists as I see him everywhere

Synthesis = the only way a god can exist is by someone’s faith

New thesis = God doesn’t exist except in someone’s mid

Antithesis = I know god is real because I feel him in my heart

Synthesis = god is a felt experience that requires no evidence

New thesis = subjective feelings of awe and emotion are explainable by neuroscience

Antithesis = god speaks to me in my heart and my head. I feel god’s presence.

Synthesis = the brain is responsible for god